Parks and Landscape at Nambiar's Beverly Green

What the master plan draws is the whole of the landscaped provision at Nambiar's Beverly Green, and nothing beyond it: six landscaped parks along the southern edge of Phase 1, a road hierarchy of 12 m and 12.19 m internal roads with 9.14 m secondary roads, an entrance plaza with a dedicated bus bay, and a retail and commercial block at the gate. Those are the shared spaces the layout commits to. The landscape specification itself has not been released — no planting schedule, no play equipment, no paving, lighting or water detail — and none will be invented on this page. What follows reads the outdoor realm honestly: what is drawn, what that is worth, and what stays an open question.

For the layout these spaces belong to, see the Phase 1 layout page; the wider position on facilities is set out on the amenities page.

The Six Parks Along the Southern Edge

Rather than a scatter of pockets, the drawing runs six parks along the southern boundary of Phase 1, forming one continuous green edge. Two things follow. Plots on that side gain a permanent open frontage that cannot be built out later, since the land in front of them is committed on the layout. The rest of the phase gains a walkable destination in one direction — a run of open space long enough to be worth the walk, which small dispersed pockets never are.

About their contents, nothing at all has been published. There is no planting schedule, no tree list, no lawn or hardscape split, no play equipment specification, no seating, lighting or path detail, and no statement about whether any built structure will stand in them. Nor has their combined area been released, and since no overall open-space percentage has been published for this project, none is quoted here.

In practical terms the parks are committed as land and not yet as landscape. Ask what is contracted to be built and planted within them, and at which stage of the project that happens.

The Road Hierarchy as Public Realm

Far more than any park, the roads are the outdoor space a villa community uses every day. Three widths run through the layout: 12 m and 12.19 m on the main internal roads, and 9.14 m on the secondary runs between plot clusters.

Two-way movement, a parked visitor's car and a planted verge, all at once: a 12 m section is generous enough to carry that combination, and the combination is what decides whether a villa street stays pleasant once every household owns two cars and a delivery van arrives twice a day. Narrow layouts fail at exactly that point. Whether the verges are in fact planted belongs to the landscape specification that has not been released — the width makes planting possible without confirming it.

Ask which of the three widths fronts your own plot. Frontage, turning space, passing traffic and the amount of light reaching the front of the house all move with the answer.

The Entrance Plaza and the Bus Bay

Everything entering Phase 1 passes through one gate, and the plan equips that entrance with a formal plaza and a dedicated bus bay.

That bus bay does more work than the name suggests. School transport in the morning, staff transport through the day: a community of 298 households generates a great deal of stopping and waiting, and with no bay every bit of it happens on Bannerghatta Road itself. The bay takes it off the carriageway and puts the waiting inside the gate instead of on an arterial road. Provision of this kind goes unnoticed when it is present and hurts when it is absent.

Left unstated: the capacity of the bay, and whether the plaza is shaded, seated, paved or planted. Both belong to the specification that has not been issued.

The Retail Block at the Gate

At the entrance the plan places a retail and commercial block, and that block is what carries the efficiency figure from 49.16% residential alone to 50.80% residential-plus-commercial.

Where it is placed is the deliberate part. Put convenience retail inside a residential layout and it draws non-resident cars, delivery vehicles and evening footfall onto the streets where people live; keep it at the gate and that traffic never comes in. The trade-off falls on the plots nearest the entrance, which are also nearest the activity — a fair question to raise about any specific plot, and one that only the drawing can answer.

Nothing has been released about this block's tenant mix, built-up area, operating hours or parking provision. Where the presence or absence of day-to-day retail bears on your decision, ask what is contracted rather than what is intended.

The 220 kV Line Shares the Southern Edge

A 220 kV high-tension line has been realigned along the southern boundary, which puts it on the same edge as the six parks. This page states that rather than leaving it to the master-plan page alone, because a buyer choosing a plot for its park frontage is choosing a plot on that edge.

Nothing here is concealed; the line appears on the sanctioned layout. The response to it is specific. Ask for the sanctioned plan showing the realigned route, confirm the statutory corridor width, confirm how that corridor relates to the park areas and to the nearest plots, and get the distance to your particular plot recorded in writing. To the east of the layout a 400 kVA HT line also runs; put the same questions about it if the plot you are considering is on that side.

What Has Not Been Released

To be unambiguous about the gaps in the outdoor provision:

• No landscape specification — no planting schedule, tree list, lawn or hardscape split, paving, seating, lighting, irrigation or water feature detail.
• No play equipment or children's facility has been specified within the parks.
• No park areas and no overall open-space percentage.
• The clubhouse facility schedule has not been released. A 60,000 sq.ft. clubhouse with a duplex and indoor amenities is on record, but what is inside it has not been released — no pool, sports court, amphitheatre or jogging track has been placed on record for this project. The clubhouse, the parks, the roads, the plaza, the bus bay and the retail block are the whole of the documented common provision.
• No landscape maintenance scope. Maintenance is charged at ₹48 per sq.ft. for the first year including 18% GST, with an equal maintenance deposit, but what that buys in the parks has not been itemised.

Bare parks are not what any of this predicts. What it says is that nothing about them has been committed in writing, and until it is, nobody should pay for it. Thin is the wrong word for the shared realm — a 60,000 sq.ft. clubhouse with a duplex and indoor amenities is on record alongside the parks — but undescribed is the right one, and that is a different problem, fixable only by the developer. Inside each house the provision is fully drawn: the entire second floor of every villa is terrace, covered on the terrace level page.

What to Ask Before You Commit

1. What is contracted to be built and planted in the six parks, and at what stage?
2. What area do the parks cover, and is that area recorded on the sanctioned layout?
3. Which road width fronts my plot, and is the verge planted?
4. Where does the 220 kV corridor run relative to the parks and to my plot, and how wide is it?
5. What does the maintenance charge cover in the landscaped areas specifically?
6. What is filed with K-RERA? Once registration is granted, the filed layout supersedes every statement here.

K-RERA Status

K-RERA registration for this project has been applied for; approval is expected by 20 August 2026 and no registration number has been allotted — the project is pre-launch. Everything on this page yields, once registration is granted, to the registered documents and sanctioned plans as the legally binding source. Verify status at rera.karnataka.gov.in.